Fulton 1.3

Posted on November 15, 2017

1.16.* Let V,W be algebraic sets in \mathbb{A}^n(k). Show that V=W if and only if I(V)=I(W).

Suppose V=W. Then by (6), I(V)=I(W). Conversely, suppose I(V)=I(W). Then by (9), V(I(V))=V and V(I(W))=W. By (3), since I(V)=I(W), V(I(V))=V(I(W)). Therefore V=W.

1.17.* (a) Let V be an algebraic set in \mathbb{A}^n(k), P\in\mathbb{A}^n(k) a point not in V. Show that there is a polynomial F\in k[X_1,\ldots,X_n] such that F(Q)=0 for all Q\in V, but F(P)=1.

Since P\not\in V, there exists F\in I(V) such that F(P)\ne 0. Moreover, F(Q)=0 for all Q\in V by definition of I(V). Since k is a field there exists (F(P))^{-1}\in k such that (F(P))^{-1}F(P)=1. Let G=(F(P))^{-1}F. Observe G(Q)=(F(P))^{-1}F(Q)=0 for all Q\in V and G(P)=(F(P))^{-1}F(P)=1.

(b) Let P_1,\ldots,P_r be distinct points in \mathbb{A}^n(k), not in an algebraic set V. Show that there are polynomials F_1,\ldots,F_r\in I(V) such that F_i(P_j)=0 if i\ne j, and F_i(P_i)=1.

Let i\in \{1,\ldots,r\}. Let W_i=V\cup\{P_1,\ldots,P_r\}\setminus\{P_i\}. Since P_i\not\in W_i, by (a) there exists F_i\in I(W_i) such that F_i(P_j)= 0 for all j\ne i, and F_i(P_i)=1.

(c) With P_1,\ldots,P_r and V as in (b), and a_{ij}\in k for 1\le i,j\le r, show that there are G_i\in I(V) with G_i(P_j)=a_{ij} for all i and j.

Let F_1,\ldots,F_r be as in (b). For each i\in\{1,\ldots,r\} define G_i= \sum_{j=1}^ra_{ij}F_j. Then for i,j\in\{1,\ldots,r\},          G_i(P_j)=\sum_{l=1}^ra_{il}F_l(P_j)=a_{ij}.

1.18.* Let I be an ideal in a ring R. If a^n\in I, b^m\in I, show that (a+b)^{n+m}\in I.

By the binomial theorem observe          (a+b)^{n+m}=\sum_{i=0}^{n+m}\binom{n+m}{i}a^{n+m-i}b^{i}. If i<m then n+m-i>n. Therefore each term of the sum has either a^n or b^m as a factor. Since a^n,b^m\in I, (a+b)^{n+m}\in I.

Show that \text{Rad}(I) is an ideal, in fact a radical ideal.

Suppose a,b\in\text{Rad}(I), that is, suppose a^n,b^m\in I for some n,m\in\mathbb{N}. By our result above, (a+b)^{n+m}\in I. Thus a+b\in\text{Rad}(I). Moreover if a\in \text{Rad}(I), then -a\in\text{Rad}(I). Thus \text{Rad}(I) is an abelian group.

Now suppose a\in\text{Rad}(I), with a^n\in I, n\in\mathbb{N}. Let r\in R. Clearly (ra)^n=r^na^n\in I and thus ra\in\text{Rad}(I). Thus \text{Rad}(I) is an ideal.

Finally, suppose r\in R such that r^n\in\text{Rad}(I), n\in\mathbb{N}. Then (r^n)^m\in I for some m\in\mathbb{N}. So r^{nm}\in I and r\in\text{Rad}(I). Thus \text{Rad}(I) is a radical ideal.

1.19. Show that I=(X^2+1)\subset\mathbb{R}[X] is a radical (even a prime) ideal, but I is not the ideal of any set in \mathbb{A}^1(\mathbb{R}).

Note X^2+1 is irreducible as it is degree 2 and has no roots in \mathbb{R}. Therefore (X^2+1) is a prime ideal. Moreover, since X^2+1 has no roots in \mathbb{R}, X^2+1\not\in I(V(S)) for any S\subset\mathbb{A}^1(\mathbb{R}), S\ne\emptyset. Additionally, I(V(\emptyset))=\mathbb{R}[X]\ne(X^2+1). Thus (X^2+1) is not the ideal of any set in \mathbb{A}^1(\mathbb{R}).

1.20.* Show that for any ideal I in k[X_1,\ldots,X_n], V(I)=V( \text{Rad}(I)), and \text{Rad}(I)\subset I(V(I)).

It is clear I\subset\text{Rad}(I), so V(\text{Rad}(I))\subset V(I). Suppose P\in V(I). Let F\in\text{Rad}(I). Then F^n\in I. Therefore (F(P))^n=0. Thus F(P) =0, since there are no zero divisors in k. Thus P\in V(\text{Rad}(I)). So V(I)=V(\text{Rad}(I)).

Observe by the result above we have I(V(I))=I(V(\text{Rad}(I))). Therefore by (8), \text{Rad}(I)\subset I(V(I)).

1.21.* Show that I=(X_1-a_1,\ldots,X_n-a_n)\subset k[X_1,\ldots,X_n] is a maximal ideal, and that the natural homomorphism from k to k[X_1,\ldots, X_n]/I is an isomorphism.

Suppose J is an ideal such that I\subset J. Let F\in J. By Problem 1.7 we may write          F=\sum\lambda_(i)(X_1-a_1)^{i_1}\ldots(X-a_n)^{i_n}. If F has no constant term clearly F\in I. Suppose F\not\in I, that is, suppose F has a nonzero constant term c\in k. Then we may write F=G+c with G\in I. Thus F-G=c\in J. So 1\in J and J=k[X_1,\ldots,X_n]. Therefore J=I or J=k[X_1,\ldots,X_n]. So I is maximal.

Let \varphi:k\to k[X_1,\ldots,X_n]/I be the natural homomorphism. Let F+I\in k[X_1,\ldots,X_n]/I. By the same argument above we may write F=G+c with G\in I, c\in k. Thus F+I=c+I=\varphi(c). So \varphi is surjective. Moreover, \ker\varphi=I\cap k=\{0\}. Thus \varphi is injective. Hence \varphi is an isomorphism.